Markus GrafandClaude
d36a18d28b
Initialize minimal Hugo site structure with Bootstrap 5.3.2 integration for markusgraf.ch conversion. Implements OpenSpec proposal add-minimal-hugo-site. Features: - Hugo project structure with standard directories - Base layout template (baseof.html) with Bootstrap 5.3.2 via CDN - Homepage (index.html) and single page (single.html) templates - Reusable partials: header, footer, navigation - Responsive Bootstrap grid layout - Mobile-first design with semantic HTML5 - Valid HTML output with basic accessibility features - Taxonomies disabled for minimal site (see docs/TAXONOMIES.md) Documentation: - IMPLEMENTATION_SUMMARY.md - Complete implementation guide - docs/TAXONOMIES.md - Guide for re-enabling categories/tags - static/README.md - Guide for placing static assets Configuration: - hugo.toml configured for markusgraf.ch - .gitignore for Hugo build artifacts All 24 tasks from OpenSpec proposal completed successfully. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
28 lines
2.3 KiB
Markdown
28 lines
2.3 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: OpenSpec: Proposal
|
|
description: Scaffold a new OpenSpec change and validate strictly.
|
|
category: OpenSpec
|
|
tags: [openspec, change]
|
|
---
|
|
<!-- OPENSPEC:START -->
|
|
**Guardrails**
|
|
- Favor straightforward, minimal implementations first and add complexity only when it is requested or clearly required.
|
|
- Keep changes tightly scoped to the requested outcome.
|
|
- Refer to `openspec/AGENTS.md` (located inside the `openspec/` directory—run `ls openspec` or `openspec update` if you don't see it) if you need additional OpenSpec conventions or clarifications.
|
|
- Identify any vague or ambiguous details and ask the necessary follow-up questions before editing files.
|
|
|
|
**Steps**
|
|
1. Review `openspec/project.md`, run `openspec list` and `openspec list --specs`, and inspect related code or docs (e.g., via `rg`/`ls`) to ground the proposal in current behaviour; note any gaps that require clarification.
|
|
2. Choose a unique verb-led `change-id` and scaffold `proposal.md`, `tasks.md`, and `design.md` (when needed) under `openspec/changes/<id>/`.
|
|
3. Map the change into concrete capabilities or requirements, breaking multi-scope efforts into distinct spec deltas with clear relationships and sequencing.
|
|
4. Capture architectural reasoning in `design.md` when the solution spans multiple systems, introduces new patterns, or demands trade-off discussion before committing to specs.
|
|
5. Draft spec deltas in `changes/<id>/specs/<capability>/spec.md` (one folder per capability) using `## ADDED|MODIFIED|REMOVED Requirements` with at least one `#### Scenario:` per requirement and cross-reference related capabilities when relevant.
|
|
6. Draft `tasks.md` as an ordered list of small, verifiable work items that deliver user-visible progress, include validation (tests, tooling), and highlight dependencies or parallelizable work.
|
|
7. Validate with `openspec validate <id> --strict` and resolve every issue before sharing the proposal.
|
|
|
|
**Reference**
|
|
- Use `openspec show <id> --json --deltas-only` or `openspec show <spec> --type spec` to inspect details when validation fails.
|
|
- Search existing requirements with `rg -n "Requirement:|Scenario:" openspec/specs` before writing new ones.
|
|
- Explore the codebase with `rg <keyword>`, `ls`, or direct file reads so proposals align with current implementation realities.
|
|
<!-- OPENSPEC:END -->
|